Supreme Court Archives

.td-main-page-wrap
{
    padding-top: 0px;
}

.category-padding-remove .td-post-category
{
    padding-left:0px;
}

@media(min-width: 1019px) {
.td_block_24 .td-column-2 .td_module_19 .td-module-image {
left: auto;
right: 0;

}
.td_block_24 .td-column-2 .td_module_19 .td-item-details {
margin-left: 0;
margin-right: 294px;
}
}

.title-headings-cm
{
    
}

.img-left-elections  a
{
        background-position: left center!important;
}

.remove-title .td-block-title-wrap
{
    display: none;
}

.navigation-center .td-next-prev-wrap 
{
        text-align: center;
}

.spotlight-federal
{
   /* height: 72px; */
}

.features-single-post-federal .td-image-container
{
    
    width: 627px;
}

.features-story-federal .td_block_single_image
{
       height: 245px;
}

.features-story-federal .td_module_flex_1
{
       height: 288px;
}

.states-list-type .td_module_flex_3 .entry-title::before
{ 
     color: #FF9900;
    content: "\2022";
    font-size: 40px;
    padding: 0px;
    padding-right: 8px;
    position: relative;
    top: 8px;
    margin-left: -20px;
  
}

.opinion-img-border .entry-thumb
{
    border: 2px solid #FF9900;
}

.election-heading .td-block-title 
{
                                                
  background-image: url('https://thefederal.com/file/2019/02/Group-339.png');
  
      background-repeat: no-repeat;
      padding-left: 53px;
      height: 38px;
          padding-top: 5px;
}

.elections-row-height
{
    
}

.remove-link .td-pulldown-category
{
    display:none;
}

.inner-page-infinite .td-post-author-name
{
    display:none;
}

.inner-page-infinite .td-module-comments
{
    display:none;
}

.inner-page-infinite .td-read-more

{
    display:none;
        counter-reset: esum;
}

.order-list-federal div.td_module_flex_1{

position: relative;
  counter-increment: esum;
  padding: 10px;
    
    
}

.order-list-federal div.td_module_flex_1:before{
     content: counter(esum);
     background-color: #FF9900;
       padding: 12px;
    color: white;
    font-size: 41px;
  float: left;
    margin-top: 13px;
    margin-right: 5px;
}

.features-single-post-federal .td_module_flex_1
{
    height: 100%;
}

.leadstory-image
{
    height: 100%!important;
}

.home-vid{
    
}

.featured-template-c-single-post .entry-title 
{
    display: none;
}
.faultlines .entry-title.td-module-title, .disableanchortag .td-module-title {
    display: none;
}
.liveicon .live-tag-federal .td-post-category{
    display: block;
    background-color: red !important;
    padding-top: 5px;
    color: #fff;
    text-transform: capitalize !important;
    margin-left:10px;
    }
.liveicon .td-post-category{
    display:none;
}
.liveicon .live-tag-federal{
    width:33%;
}

.eighthcolum .td-module-meta-info{
    margin-top: 75px;
    
}
.eighthcolum .td-block-title-wrap{
    position: absolute;
}
.eighthcolum .td-image-container{
    width: 30%;
    /*margin-top: -77px;*/
    
    
}
@media screen and (max-width: 767px) {
    .eighthcolum .td-image-container{
    width: 100% !important;
    margin-top: 0;
    order: 1!important;
    }
    .eighthcolum .td-pulldown-size{
        margin: 30px 0 0 25px !important;
        
    }
}
.eighthcolum .td-module-meta-info{
padding: 0 0 0 50px;
    
}
.eighthcolum .td-pulldown-size{
color: #fff;
background: url(https://thefederal.com/file/2019/03/eye.png)no-repeat 0px;
padding-left: 28px;
font-size: 18px;
font-weight: 400;
margin: 30px 0 0 48px;
}
.repluck .td-element-style {
    background-color: #ccc !important;
}
.eighthcolum .entry-title a{
position:absolute;
}
.eighthcolum h1.entry-title {
    margin-bottom:50px !important;
}
.eighthcolum h3.entry-title{
    margin-bottom:50px !important;
}

@media screen and(max-width:767px){
    .eighthcolum .entry-title a{
position:relative !important;
}
.eighthcolum h3.entry-title{
    margin-bottom:20px !important;
}
    
}

Supreme Court

What SC ruling means for the future of telecom sector and customers

SC order on AGR dues: Das says will discuss internally if issues arise

Trial court can issue fresh date for hanging of Nirbhaya convicts: SC

After SC rap, DoT orders telcos to settle dues by 11.59 pm tonight

SC dismisses Nirbhaya convict’s plea challenging rejection of mercy petition

Why wasn’t due of ₹1.47 lakh cr paid? Supreme Court asks telcos

Can SC ruling on ‘tainted netas’ cleanse politics?

PMK happy over SC line on Rajiv case convicts, asks TN govt to remind Governor

Oppn targets govt over SC ruling on quota in promotion in Lok Sabha