Gujarat court acquits 35 in post-Godhra riots, slams pseudo-secular media, politicians

A court at Halol town in Gujarat’s Panchmahal district has acquitted all 35 persons in connection with four different post-Godhra 2002 riots in which three people were killed.

In its order of June 12, which was made available on June 15, the court of Additional Sessions Judge Harsh Trivedi also slammed pseudo-secular media and politicians for claiming that the riots were planned. The 35 persons were accused of murder and rioting after violence erupted near Kalol bus stand, Delol village and Derol station area on February 28, 2002, a day after the Sabarmati Express blaze at Godhra.

Also read: Godhra train carnage: Supreme Court grants bail to 8 convicts; plea of 4 others rejected

Failure to produce evidence

While the prosecution claimed that three persons were killed with deadly weapons and then their bodies burnt with the intention to destroy evidence, the court said it failed to produce evidence against the accused. There were 52 accused in the cases of which 17 died during the pendency of trial that went on for over 20 years.

According to case papers, the police were informed about three missing persons during cops’ visit to relief camps set up in the wake of the riots that broke out in the area. It was alleged that riots broke out between Hindus and Muslims in Kalol town and two other places. A few days later, the bodies of three missing persons from the minority community were found.

All the 52 accused, booked under charges pertaining to rioting, unlawful assembly and murder, were arrested and sent to sub-jails at Kalol, Halol and Godhra before being released on bail. A total of 130 witnesses were examined during the trial.

Also read: Godhra train burning case in SC: Gujarat govt to seek death penalty for 11 convicts

Recovery of weapons not proved

The court said in its judgment that no charge of rioting can sustain against any of the accused persons, and the prosecution even failed to prove recovery and seizure of weapons.

As per the order, it is the duty of the court to see that no innocent persons are implicated along with the guilty because of the tendency of the parties in communal rioting cases to try to falsely implicate as many persons from the opposite community as possible.

In cases of communal riots cases the police usually prosecute members of both the community. But it is for the court to ascertain in such cases, which of the two versions is correct and the court can’t shirk this duty on ground that the police did not ascertain which of the stories was true, the judge observed.

(With agency inputs)