Rahul Gandhi, US, New York, NRIs, Washington DC, Los Angeles
x
Rahul Gandhi is also likely to visit Washington DC and Los Angeles during his over-a-week-long stay in the US. (File photo)

Rahul Gandhi defends his UK remarks at Parliamentary panel meet


Amid BJP’s insistence on an apology over his “democracy under attack” remark in the UK, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Saturday (March 18) defended it at a parliamentary panel meet, saying he never sought any foreign intervention over the issue.

Rahul further reiterated his position that India’s democracy was “under attack” and “this was known” to all. He is learnt to have said at the meeting of the Parliamentary Consultative Committee of External Affairs that he could not be dubbed as “anti-national” for his remarks.

Acrimonious exchanges

The Congress MP’s remarks were made at a meeting of the Ministry of External Affairs consultative committee. It witnessed acrimonious exchanges after BJP members questioned Rahul’s UK remarks, without naming him, the sources said.

Also read: Asked nobody to intervene, Rahul Gandhi clarifies on his London remarks

The exchanges marred the meeting where the principal agenda was India’s G20 presidency. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor tweeted, “A good meeting of the Consultative Committee on External Affairs today on India’s foreign policy objectives in the G20 was somewhat marred by some members needlessly politicising the discussion. Rahul Gandhi robustly responded to them and it ended with an amicable group photograph.”

Tharoor also tweeted the picture of panel members with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar.

At the meeting, BJP MP GVL Narasimha Rao is learnt to have said that India is the “mother of democracy but concerted efforts were underway to undermine the country”. Rao cited the “Hindenburg report on industrialist Gautam Adani; the recent remarks by George Soros about a government change in India and the BBC documentary” to make his point.

Rao also said, “Some people have spoken things…but the real blot on Indian democracy was the Emergency.”

According to the sources, later one more BJP MP questioned Rahul’s UK remarks without naming him. Priyanka Chaturvedi of Shiv Sena (Uddhav Thackeray) argued that Indian democracy, strong as it is, “should not get deterred by random comments of people or some documentary”.

Also read: If democracy was functioning, I would be allowed to speak: Rahul Gandhi

After everyone had spoken following a presentation on G20 by the foreign secretary (where Rahul did not offer any comments), the former Congress chief intervened and said he wanted to respond since BJP members had spoken about him.

At this point, Rahul said “attack on India’s democracy was evident”, but added that he never sought any foreign intervention in the matter.

Rahul questions whether ED is targeting opposition leaders only

The sources said Jaishankar, chair of the meeting, urged Rahul to reserve his remarks on the subject for the Parliament. But Rahul insisted on his right to respond and is learnt to have asked whether or not the “ED was targeting opposition leaders only”.

Nominated BJP MP Mahesh Jethmalani intervened and said Rahul should not bring his “personal angst into a meeting meant to discuss G20”, the sources said.

Rahul is, however, said to have argued that it was the BJP MPs who veered from the main topic, which was why he needed to reply.

Hindenburg report not an attack on Indian democracy: Rahul

Rahul, sources said, also questioned the take that the Hindenburg report was an attack on Indian democracy and said, “The report is about financial dealings of a crony capitalist. Adani is not India.”

Also read: Drooling over China, dismissive about India: Jaishankar on Rahul Gandhi

Another BJP MP, without taking names, claimed that the Emergency was a “blot on India’s democracy” and some people were trying to divert attention.

The BJP leaders have launched a major offensive against Rahul both inside and outside Parliament. They are demanding a public apology from him for what they alleged has insulted the country and its institutions on foreign soil.

(With agency inputs)

Read More
Next Story