In a report filed by the Juvenile Justice Committee of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court in the Supreme Court, 144 juveniles were detained in the state after the Centre abrogated provisions of Article 370, but 142 minors were later released.
The committee told the apex court that the remaining two were sent to juvenile homes.
The matter came up for hearing in the top court on Tuesday (October 1), in front of a bench of justices NV Ramana, MR Shah and BR Gavai.
The bench addressed senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for child rights activists Enakshi Ganguly and Shanta Sinha and said that it has received a report from the Juvenile Justice Committee of the high court, in which the averments regarding alleged detention of minors have been denied.
Ahmadi said he would like to file a reply to the report of the committee which was allowed by the bench and listed the matter for hearing after two weeks.
On September 20, the apex court had asked the committee to undertake an exercise with regard to the facts stated in a petition filed by the two child right activists, who have alleged that minors were illegally detained in Jammu and Kashmir after the Centre scrapped the special status of the state under Article 370.
The four-member Juvenile Justice Committee of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court, headed by Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, said in its report that when the September 23 order of the apex court was brought to its notice, a meeting was immediately convened to ascertain the facts from the agencies concerned.
Also read: Article 370: SC fixes Nov 14 for hearing on constitutional validity of Centre’s decision
“The committee also decided to obtain data from the courts subordinate to the High Court of J&K, and the registrars judicial of the two wings of the high court about the bail applications or Habeas Corpus petitions, if any, moved on behalf of juveniles or where it was claimed that the arrested persons or the detainees were juveniles,” the committee said in its report to the top court.
Citing information provided by police and other agencies, the committee gave details of the cases under which these juveniles were detained.
It said pursuant to the direction, the Jammu and Kashmir DGP filed a report on September 25 in which he categorically refuted the assertions and allegations made in the media and the petition.
“It is pertinent to state that no child has been kept or taken into illegal detention by police authorities as strict adherence is placed on the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act,” the DGPs report to the committee said.
“However, in connection with the children, whosoever was found in conflict with law, same was strictly dealt in consonance with provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children Act and strict directions have been provided from time to time to deal with the provisions of the relevant Act,” it said.
“The averments hence surfaced in the petition have been wrongly reflected in the petition and stand devoid of merits,” it added.
Also read: SC sets up five-judge bench to hear pleas on abrogation of Article 370
Quoting the DGPs report, the committee told the top court that he has categorically denied the allegations made in the petition.
Citing one instance which the petition has referred to that in violation of law the juveniles have been picked up by police and lodged in the jail, the DGP report said the averment does not corroborate with information received from the field formations.
“It is nothing but facts having been imagined from thin air submitted before the court,” the report said.
The DGP report to the committee also referred to a reported incident of an 11-year-old being detained and said it was not factually correct.
“It seems that this report has been generated with the intention to malign the police and to create the story which may have element of sensationalism,” the DGPs report to the committee said.
Similarly, the DGP report also referred to various reported incidents which appeared in the print and online media, including some foreign publications, and the averments made in the petition and categorically denied them.
The committee, in its report to the top court, has also said that two observation homes have been established in the state — one at Harwan in Srinagar and other at R S Pora in Jammu.
Thirty-six juveniles were lodged in Harwans observation home since August 5, out of which 21 were bailed out while enquiry regarding 15 was going on, it said.
Ten juveniles were lodged at R S Pora observation home from August 5 till September 23, out of which six were bailed out while enquiry against remaining four was going on, it added.
(With inputs from agencies)