Tamil Nadu bypolls will put political defections to the voter test

Many people in Tamil Nadu may view the bypolls to the Madurantakam and Dharapuram Assembly constituencies on October 6 mainly as a test of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam’s (TVK) political strength and the performance of its government.

There is, however, another test that deserves more attention. These bypolls will give voters an unusual opportunity to decide whether elected representatives who abandon the party under whose symbol they were elected should pay a political price.

The two constituencies became vacant after AIADMK MLAs Maragatham Kumaravel and P Sathyabama resigned from the Assembly and joined the TVK. Both had been elected in the 2026 Assembly election as AIADMK candidates. TVK has now fielded both again, Kumaravel in Madurantakam and Sathyabama in Dharapuram.

Question of political accountability

This raises a basic question about the meaning of an electoral mandate. When voters elect a candidate under a party’s name and symbol, are they choosing only the individual, or also the political platform that the candidate represents? The answer cannot be reduced to either side. Candidates matter, but in a party-based parliamentary system, party affiliation and its symbol are also part of the choice voters make. This is particularly evident in Tamil Nadu, where political parties and symbols have traditionally played a central role in elections. An MLA has the legal right to resign and may have genuine reasons for leaving a party. But legality does not settle the question of political accountability. A representative may be free to leave a party, but voters are equally free to decide whether they will endorse that decision.

Also read | TN by-elections: Can Vijay’s TVK-led front capture AIADMK’s old strongholds?

The timing of the resignation makes the issue particularly significant. The new government was sworn in on May 10, and the two MLAs resigned barely three weeks later. The legislators themselves chose to give up the seats they had just won and seek a fresh mandate under another party. That makes these bypolls different from an ordinary political realignment. Normally, voters have to wait until the next Assembly election to judge a representative’s conduct. Here, the former MLAs have chosen to return to the same electorate and ask voters to endorse their new political affiliation almost immediately.

If Kumaravel and Sathyabama win again, it will certainly demonstrate TVK’s electoral strength. But it will also suggest that voters have accepted their decision to switch parties, or have considered other factors more important. The political message would be that changing sides soon after an election does not necessarily carry an electoral cost. That could create an important incentive for other legislators. If a politician can win on one party’s symbol, resign soon afterwards, join another party, and secure re-election, switching sides becomes a relatively low-risk strategy. Party affiliation could begin to look like a temporary political arrangement rather than a commitment made to voters.

What will the voters decide?

The circumstances surrounding the resignations also raise the more uncomfortable question of inducement. When the AIADMK MLAs resigned and joined TVK in May, AIADMK and other opposition leaders alleged horse-trading, while TVK rejected the charge. There is no need for the bypoll to establish whether money changed hands. The more important question is what such a sequence does to the meaning of an electoral mandate. If an elected representative can be persuaded to surrender a seat won under one party’s banner and immediately seek the same seat under another, voters may reasonably ask whether political allegiance has become transferable.

If the defectors lose, the electorate could provide an answer that no legal proceeding can: whatever the reason for the switch, the voters did not accept it. Such a verdict would have consequences beyond the two MLAs. It could raise the political cost not only for legislators contemplating such moves but also for parties seeking to recruit elected representatives immediately after an election. Parties may think twice before assuming that an MLA’s support can simply be transferred along with the seat.

Also read | Madras HC stops EC from notifying bypolls to 5 TN Assembly seats

This is where electoral accountability becomes important because the law cannot do everything. The anti-defection framework deals with specified forms of party-switching and provides for disqualification in certain circumstances. Courts can examine legal challenges. But none of these mechanisms can answer the political question that ultimately matters: does the electorate still trust a representative who has abandoned the party under whose symbol that representative was elected? Only voters can answer that.

Implications for the parties

A defeat for the former MLAs would therefore send a broader message: political defection, even when legally possible, can carry an electoral cost. A victory would send the opposite message: voters are willing to separate the individual candidate from the party under whose banner the candidate originally won.

The bypolls will also have immediate implications for the parties. For the AIADMK, retaining the seats would show that its voters did not simply follow the legislators who left and that the party’s identity remains stronger than any individual candidate. For the TVK, victory would provide its government with early electoral validation. For the DMK, a win would allow it to argue that the ruling party’s first months in office have not translated into public acceptance.

The larger question

However, these calculations should not obscure the larger question. Democracy depends partly on laws and institutions, but also on the behaviour that elections reward or punish. Legislators respond to political incentives. If voters punish representatives who abandon the mandate on which they were elected, switching sides becomes more difficult. If voters routinely re-elect them, politicians learn the opposite lesson.

Also read | ‘Political poaching not a new trend in TN’; will TVK resist or fall prey?

The October 6 bypolls, therefore, deserve attention beyond the usual contest between AIADMK, DMK, TVK, and other parties. They offer voters a rare opportunity to make an immediate judgement on political conduct. The question is not simply which party will win the two Assembly seats. It is whether an elected representative can change political allegiance soon after an election and reasonably expect the voters to follow.

Along with Kumaravel and Sathyabama, the voters are also being put on trial on October 6. Their decision could have a wider impact on political conduct in the state by determining whether an electoral mandate is something a politician can carry from one party to another, or something that must be earned again.

(The Federal seeks to present views and opinions from all sides of the spectrum. The information, ideas or opinions in the articles are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Federal.)