SC flags Sonam Wangchuk’s health, asks Centte to review detention

Expressing concern over the health condition of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, the Supreme Court on Wednesday (February 4) asked the Centre whether there was any possibility for it reconsider his detention.

‘Wangchuk's health report not good’

The remark was made by a bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and P B Varale, who further stated that Wangchuk's health report was not good. The bench asked Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj, appearing for the Centre, to seek instructions in the matter.

Also Read: Wangchuk detained for instigating people in sensitive border area: Centre to SC

"Apart from submissions, counter submissions and law points, just give a thought to it, as an officer of the Court. The detention order is passed on September 26, 2025, nearly five months,” stated the bench.

"Considering the health condition of the detainee... The report which we saw earlier, it shows that his health is not that good. There are certain age-related, maybe otherwise. Is there a possibility for the government to rethink, or even relook?” it observed orally.

Centre blames Wangchuk for Leh violence

Nataraj said that he would put the suggestion to the concerned authorities. He further stated that Wangchuk was responsible for violence in Leh last year, in which four people died and 161 were injured.

Also Read: Sonam Wangchuk not seen in videos used for NSA detention: Sibal informs SC

"It was ultimately his provocative speech, provocation, and instigation. The person need not actively participate, the propensity of a person to influence a group of persons...that is more than sufficient," added Nataraj.

‘Wangchuk detained for instigating people’

The development comes after the Centre and the Union Territory of Ladakh administration had told the apex court that Wangchuk was detained for instigating people in a border area where regional sensitivity is involved.

Also Read: Parliamentary panel urges UGC to recognise Sonam Wangchuk’s HIAL in Ladakh

Justifying Wangchuk's detention, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had told the bench that all procedural safeguards were followed while ordering his detention under the National Security Act (NSA).

On Monday, the Centre had said that Wangchuk tried to instigate Gen Z for protests like in Nepal and Bangladesh.

Mehta had said that Wangchuk even referred to Arab Spring-like agitation, which has led to the overthrow of multiple governments in countries of the Arab world.

Plea by Wangchuk’s wife

The top court was hearing a plea filed by Gitanjali J Angmo, the wife of Wangchuk, against his detention under the stringent NSA.

The NSA empowers the Centre and states to detain individuals to prevent them from acting in a manner "prejudicial to the defence of India". The maximum detention period is 12 months, though it can be revoked earlier.

Also Read: Ladakh seeks statehood, Sixth Schedule status in new proposal

On January 29, Wangchuk, who is under detention in the Jodhpur Central Jail, denied allegations that he made a statement to overthrow the government like the 'Arab Spring', emphasising that he has the democratic right to criticise and protest.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Angmo, submitted that police have relied on "borrowed material" and selective videos to mislead the detaining authority.

Angmo claims the detention is illegal and an arbitrary exercise violating his fundamental rights.

The backdrop

Wangchuk was detained on September 26 last year, two days after violent protests demanding statehood and Sixth Schedule status for Ladakh left four people dead in the Union Territory. The government accused him of inciting the violence.

The plea said it is wholly "preposterous" that Wangchuk would suddenly be targeted after more than three decades of being recognised at the state, national and international levels for his contributions to grassroots education, innovation and environmental conservation in Ladakh and across India.

(With agency inputs)