UP govt opposes Mishra’s bail plea in SC, calls Lakhimpur Kheri crime ‘heinous’

The Uttar Pradesh government on Thursday opposed in Supreme Court the bail plea of Union Minister Ajay Kumar Mishra’s son, Ashish Mishra, who is one of the accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case.

Additional Advocate General for Uttar Pradesh, Garima Prashad, told a bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice JK Maheshwari that the crime was grave.

“It is a grave and heinous crime and (granting bail) will send a wrong signal to society,” she said after the court asked her what was the ground for opposing the bail plea.

Also read: Lakhimpur Kheri violence: May take five years to conclude trial in normal course, trial judge tells SC

The top court mentioned that there were two versions of the crime, and it could not comment on any of the versions. “We are taking prima facie view that he is involved and he is an accused and not innocent. Is it the state’s case that he has attempted to destroy evidence?” the bench asked.

To this, the additional advocate general replied, “That has not happened till now.”

“Bail will send terrible message”

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for those opposing the bail plea, said grant of bail will send a terrible message to society. “It’s a conspiracy and a well-planned murder. I will show from the charge sheet… He is the son of a powerful man being represented by a powerful lawyer,” he said.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Mishra, strongly opposed Dave’s submission and said, “What is this? Who is powerful? We are appearing every day. Can this be a condition to not grant bail?”

Rohatgi submitted that his client has been in custody for more than a year and the way the trial is going, it will take seven to eight years to complete it.

He stated that Jagjit Singh, who is the complainant in the case, is not an eyewitness and his complaint is just based on hearsay.

Also read: Lakhimpur Kheri violence: Charges farmed against Ashish Mishra, 13 others

“Jagjit Singh is the complainant and he is not an eyewitness. I am surprised that when there is a large number of people saying we ran over people mercilessly, an FIR is registered on the version of a person who is not an eyewitness?” he said.

“My client got bail in the first instance. This is not a cock and bull story and there is truth in my story,” Rohatgi stressed, adding that his client is not a criminal and there are no past records. Hearing in the matter is underway.

How it happened

On October 3, 2021, eight people were killed in Lakhimpur Kheri district’s Tikunia in a violence that erupted when farmers were protesting then Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya’s visit to the area.

According to the Uttar Pradesh Police’s FIR, four farmers were mowed down by an SUV, in which Ashish Mishra was seated. Following the incident, a driver and two BJP workers were allegedly lynched by angry farmers. A journalist also died in the violence.

On December 6 last year, a trial court framed charges against Ashish Mishra and 12 others for the alleged offences of murder, criminal conspiracy, and others in the case of the protesting farmers’ deaths in Lakhimpur Kheri, paving the way for the trial to begin.

A total of 13 accused, including Ashish Mishra, have been charged under IPC sections 147 and 148 related to rioting, 149 (unlawful assembly), 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder), 326 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means), 427 (mischief) and 120B (punishment for criminal conspiracy), and section 177 of the Motor Vehicle Act.

Also read: Lakhimpur Kheri a ‘planned conspiracy’ to kill farmers, say cops

The other 12 accused are Ankit Das, Nandan Singh Bisht, Latif Kale, Satyam alias Satya Prakash Tripathi, Shekhar Bharti, Sumit Jaiswal, Ashish Pandey, Lavkush Rana, Shishu Pal, Ullas Kumar alias Mohit Trivedi, Rinku Rana, and Dharmendra Banjara. All of them are in jail.

While hearing the matter on December 12 last year, the apex court had asked the state government, which opposed the bail plea of Ashish Mishra terming the offence “very grave”, to file an affidavit concerning the status of the case lodged over the killing of three occupants of the SUV.

(With agency inputs)