SC directs rival AIADMK factions to maintain status quo

The Supreme Court on Friday (July 29) directed rival AIADMK factions led by expelled leader O Panneerselvam (OPS) and Edappadi Palaniswami (EPS) to maintain status quo with regard to the party’s affairs and asked the Madras High Court to adjudicate upon the pleas of the OPS faction against the EPS-led general council meeting in three weeks.

In the general council meeting of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) on July 11, OPS was expelled from the party and EPS was elevated as the interim general secretary putting an end to the dual-leadership model after a bitter fight.

In the aftermath of the death of AIADMK supremo J Jayalalithaa in 2016, a dual leadership was put in place in the party and the government. Under the arrangement, Palaniswami became the chief minister and Panneerselvam, a multiple-time former CM, became his deputy. Panneerselvam was made the coordinator of the AIADMK and Palaniswami the joint coordinator.

Also Read: OPS writes to RBI asking it to freeze 6 AIADMK bank accounts

Their relations soured over time, especially after the party lost power to MK Stalin-led DMK and the dominant EPS camp ousted OPS, who then moved the Madras High Court and Supreme Court against the move.

A bench headed by Chief Justice NV Ramana, however, refused to  restore the position (status quo ante) prevailing before the general council meeting when OPS was the party coordinator.

“Our request is that their (EPS) decisions taken on July 11 be kept at abeyance and then we will fight this matter on an equal plane. Today, they (EPS faction) are in an advantageous position,” senior advocate Gurukrishna Kumar told the bench.

The submission was vehemently opposed by senior Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the EPS faction, which has gained control over the party once presided over by the redoubtable Jayalalithaa.

The bench also comprising Justices Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli asked the Madras High Court to decide the bitter fight between the rival factions without being influenced by any remarks or orders.

Also Read: Sealed AIADMK headquarters reopened after 10 days

The CJI referred to the July 6 order of a vacation bench by which the Madras High Court direction had been stayed. The high court had restrained the EPS faction from passing any unannounced resolution in the meeting of the AIADMK general and executive councils concerning the issue of single leadership of the party. The top court said because of this order, the single judge bench of the high court was unable to properly adjudicate upon the case.

“In view of the difficulties expressed by the High Court bench… Instead of keeping the matter here, we will send back the matter to the High Court for reconsideration without being influenced by the orders passed by us. We request the High Court to dispose of the matter preferably within a period of three weeks and till such time, the status quo has to be maintained by the parties. We have not expressed any opinion on merits…,” the top court said in the order.

At the outset, the senior counsel, appearing for OPS faction, said “extreme decisions” have been taken against Panneerselvam. “If that notice is contrary to the by-laws then all the consequences will go,” he contended.

Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, also appearing for the OPS faction, said that status quo, as existing on July 11, 2022, be restored as the leader has been removed without following the procedures laid down under the rules. “We cannot do that,” the bench said.

OPS had earlier filed a civil suit in the Madras High Court requesting for an order of ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents including EPS from convening the general council meet on an anonymous notice dated July 1, 2022 pending disposal of the suit.

Also Read: Madras HC grants possession of AIADMK headquarters to EPS

In a fallout of the single leadership demand in the party, the dominant EPS faction has said Panneerselvam ceased to be the coordinator following the June 23 general council meeting. The EPS faction had then summoned the next GC on July 11, ostensibly to elect Palaniswami as the single leader that day.

Convening that meet is illegal and in contravention of the bylaws of the party, “surreptitiously maneuvered” by respondents including Palaniswami and presidium chairman A Tamil Magan Hussain, Panneerselvam had said in his plea.

(With inputs from agencies)