Never said Sushant was murdered, but want justice, says Ankita Lokhande
Actor Ankita Lokhande on Wednesday said she has never claimed that Sushant Singh Rajput was "murdered" but wants "justice" for her "late friend" and his family.
Actor Ankita Lokhande on Wednesday (September 9) said she has never claimed that Sushant Singh Rajput was “murdered” but wants “justice” for her “late friend” and his family.
Rajput (34) was found dead in his Bandra apartment in June. His death has sparked a lot of controversy in the media.
Lokhande, who met Rajput on the sets of TV show “Pavitra Rishta” and dated him till 2016, had posted “Justice” on her Twitter wall after Rajput’s girlfriend Rhea Chakraborty was arrested by NCB.
Chakraborty, who has been accused of abetting Rajput’s suicide by his family, was arrested on Tuesday, by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) in a drugs case linked to the late actor’s death.
Following Chakraborty’s arrest, Lokhande tweeted, “Nothing happens by chance, by fate. You create your own fate by your actions. That’s Karma.”
JUSTICE ⚖️ pic.twitter.com/O5aRCirGPD
— Ankita lokhande Jain (@anky1912) September 8, 2020
Now, Lokhande has opened up about her reasons to stand with Rajput’s family as she shared a statement on her social media handles.
— Ankita lokhande Jain (@anky1912) September 9, 2020
“I again clarify, for the reason time and again being asked by the media to me on whether I feel it’s a murder or suicide? I have never said its a murder or anyone in particular is responsible.
“I always have encouraged justice for my late friend SSR and stood by the bereaved family and truth should be brought out by the investigating agencies,” Lokhande wrote in her statement.
Calling herself a “Maharashtrian and an Indian citizen”, the actor said she has total faith in the state government and central investigative agencies.
Lokhande also said that many people have called her names but she never responded to anything and came forward to speak about Rajput when they were together.
“I only came forward to narrate about SSR and his mental health till 2016,” she added.
Addressing her “haters”, Lokhande said Chakraborty was the closest person to the actor and so she should not have let him consume drugs.
Related news: FIR against Sushant’s sisters, doctor after Rhea’s complaint
In her message to the “haters”, she further wrote, “Dear Haters! Let us assume you must have known in and out about your friend and what’s going on in her life and relationship. Glad to see you wake up finally, but I wish you would have woken up sooner and advised your friend not to support any kind of drug abuse by SSR if any.”
“When she very well knew about his mental state by publicly stating that he was in depression. Should she have allowed a depressed man to consume drugs? How is that going to help?
“His condition would deteriorate to a level that would make a man take the action that SSR has allegedly taken. She was the closest person to him at that time,” Lokhande claimed.
The actor said that on one hand, Chakraborty was coordinating with Rajput’s doctors regarding his health issues, but on the other hand, she was “coordinating drug logistics for him”.
“Would anyone, who claims to have loved someone so deeply, allow the other person to consume drugs claiming to know his mental state and condition? Would you do that? I don’t think anyone would. So how can it not be seen as an act of carelessness and irresponsibility?” Lokhande claimed.
The actor also raised questions as to why Rajput’s family was not informed about his depression as well as his issues with drugs.
“As per her, she informed his family about his ongoing treatment but did she ever inform them about his drug consumption? I am sure she didnt because maybe she, herself, enjoyed consuming it. And this is why I feel its Karma/Fate,” she added.
Lokhande said she will continue to support Rajput’s family, while asking her haters to maintain civility. She concluded by saying, “Little advice for the unknown.’You guard your friend and I am standing by the family’. But let us maintain civility by not coming on to each other personally, either directly or indirectly.”
(With inputs from agencies)
