What gag orders on media in sexual abuse trials take away

Although trials in sexual harassment/rape cases have been generally held in-camera as stipulated under section 327(2) of CrPC, some argue that that the blanket ban on media from reporting the trial need not necessarily help the victim always | Illustration - Eunice Dhivya

The trial in the controversial abduction and rape case of a Kerala actress, in which popular actor Dileep is an accused, is nearing completion in a trial court in Ernakulum.

But what has stirred the hornet’s nest recently is the gag order by the trial court — based on the petition of the accused, not the victim.

The case that triggered a storm in Kerala dates back to February 17, 2017, when the actress was allegedly kidnapped and raped by a gang who were allegedly engaged by Dileep.

The assault was said to be a case of revenge by Dileep because the actress revealed details of his affair with another actress to his first wife and actress Manju Warrier.

To continue reading this article...

You have to be a Premium Subscriber

Start your subscription with a free trial

Enjoy unlimited Eighth column, archives and games on
The Federal.com and The Federal APP and many more features.
You will also be supporting ethical and unbiased journalism.
After trial subscription plans start from Rs. 99
Get breaking news and latest updates from India
and around the world on thefederal.com