Arvind Kejriwal, Delhi CM, Atishi, Saurabh Bhardwaj, LG
x
Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal in a file photo

₹52.71Cr spent in refurbishing Kejriwal’s official residence: Vigilance in report to Lt. Governor


The Delhi government’s Vigilance Directorate has informed the lieutenant governor that the renovation of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s official residence cost a total of ₹52.71 crore, official sources told PTI.

As per a “factual report” submitted by the directorate on Thursday (May 25), of the ₹52.71 crore, ₹33.49 was crore spent on the construction of the house and ₹19.22 crore on a camp office for the chief minister, the report said, citing records of the Public Works Department (PWD).
Responding to the report, the AAP in a statement said that it was “unfortunate” that the BJP after failing in all its attempts to malign Kejriwal’s image over the last nine years, is now targeting the chief minister’s residence.

“There is nothing in the report to say that any crime was committed. This is the first time that an official residence complex for the chief minister was created in Delhi, comprising the chief minister’s residence, an office secretariat, an auditorium and staff quarters,” it added.

Also read: Kejriwal residence renovation: Delhi LG asks officials to secure records of expenditure

The report said the then PWD minister had, in March 2020, proposed additional accommodation arrangements — a drawing room, two meeting rooms and a dining room with a capacity of 24 people — and the addition of an upper storey by remodelling the existing structure.

The PWD, however, proposed the demolition of the existing structure on the ground that it was an old one, built in 1942-43, the report said.

“It is submitted that the bungalow at 6, Flag Staff Road was constructed in 1942-43 and is a load-bearing construction. In view of the fact that it is a very old construction and has load-bearing walls, it is not recommended for remodelling the existing ground floor or for creating an additional floor,” the report said, citing a PWD note.

The PWD had recommended that additional construction may be carried out within the premises and the existing bungalow be separated by barricading. Once the construction is completed, the chief minister and his family may shift to the new bungalow and the existing bungalow can be demolished, the report said.

“It was, however, on the recommendation of PWD engineers that a new bungalow was constructed on the same premises since the existing structure, built in 1942-43, had outlived its life in 1997 itself. The PWD had argued that the old construction had load-bearing walls and was not recommended for remodelling of the existing ground floor or for creating an additional floor,” it added.

The PWD, however, could not provide the file on demolition of structures adjoining 6, Flagstaff Road, the official residence of the chief minister.

In the light of allegations of irregularities in renovating the chief minister’s official residence levelled by the BJP, LG V K Saxena had directed Chief Secretary Naresh Kumar in April for securing all the relevant files and submitting a factual report.

The report, signed by Special Secretary (Vigilance) YVVJ Rajasekhar, was submitted to the LG on May 12, a day after the Supreme Court gave executive control over services matters in Delhi to the AAP government.

According to the report, the PWD had initially estimated that the construction would incur a cost of ₹15-20 crore. The first tender of ₹8.61 crore was awarded in October 20, 2020 and it did not mention the construction of a new building.

Several new proposals for additions and alterations were subsequently made, which increased the scope of the work in terms of both the built-up area and the plinth area.

Also read: BJP stages dharna outside Kejriwal’s residence amid renovation row

The additional cost was necessitated because of superior specifications in all the components, including a modular kitchen, a pantry, a wardrobe and a laundry, the report said.
It also pointed out that the construction work was undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic against a 2020 order of the finance department that mandated expenditure of an emergency nature only.

(With inputs from agencies)

Read More
Next Story