VHP says Muslims should accept SC verdict, cites Gandhi’s view on Somnath

The statement by VHP general secretary Milind Parande came soon after the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) favoured seeking a review of the Ayodhya judgment. Photo: PTI File.

The Vishwa Hindu Parishad said on Sunday (November 17) that the Muslim community should accept the Supreme Court’s verdict in the Ayodhya dispute, and claimed that
Mahatma Gandhi had made a similar appeal in the case of the Somnath Temple.

The statement by VHP general secretary Milind Parande came soon after the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) favoured seeking a review of the Ayodhya judgment.

“Mahatma Gandhi had made a similar appeal to Muslims, urging them to accept the decision of the then union government to reconstruct the Somnath temple (which had been
destroyed in the earlier centuries) in Gujarat,” Parande claimed here.

Advertisement

Also read | AIMPLB to seek review of Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict

“Gandhi had said Muslims should accept the decision or it would give the wrong message that their attachment lies with the destructors of the temple,” he said.

Gandhi had expressed this view in his newspaper Harijan, he further claimed. “As the court’s decision on the Ramjanmabhoomi is unanimous, I think there is no need for review petition,” the VHP leader said.

Parande also said that the VHP and other organisations which were agitating for the temple were now waiting for the Union government to set up a trust — as directed by the SC — for the temple construction.

“60% of carved stones (to be used for temple construction) are ready,” he said. Parande was speaking after the inauguration of a hostel set up by the VHP for poor cancer patients coming to the city for treatment.

AIMPLB secretary Zafaryab Jilani said on Sunday that the land of the Babri mosque “belongs to Allah and under the Sharia, it cannot be given to anybody”.

“The board has also categorically stated that it was against taking five-acre land in Ayodhya in lieu of the mosque. The board is of the view that there cannot be any alternative to the mosque,” he said in Delhi.

Earlier in the day, the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind also decided to file a review petition challenging the Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict.

Also read | Muslims don’t want compensation, they want justice

The SC, in its verdict in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi title case on November 9, said the entire 2.77 acres of disputed land should be handed over to the deity Ram Lalla, who was one of the three litigants.

The five-judge Constitution bench also directed the Centre to allot a five-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board in Ayodhya to build a mosque.

Get breaking news and latest updates from India
and around the world on thefederal.com
FOLLOW US: