Political parties in Kerala welcome SC decision on Sabarimala

Supreme Court, Sabarimala, seven-judge bench, verdict
The popular temple, dedicated to Lord Ayyappa, draws thousands of devotees every day. The main pilgrim season begins next month.

Political parties in Kerala on Thursday (November 14) welcomed the Supreme Court decision to refer its September 28, 2018 order allowing women of all ages into the Lord Ayyappa temple in Sabarimala to a larger bench.

Hailing the verdict, Leader of the Opposition Ramesh Chennithala asked the Left-led state government “not to create issues” by providing security and taking women in the banned age group to offer worship at the Ayyappa temple. “Just because there is no stay of the September 28 verdict, the LDF government must try not to create issues by providing security and allowing women to enter Sabarimala. The state government must not implement its earlier agenda of taking women in the banned age group to the hill shrine,” he said.

The Supreme Court on Thursday said restrictions on women in religious places was not limited to Sabarimala alone and was prevalent in other religions as well as it referred all review pleas to a larger seven-judge bench. Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, reading the verdict on behalf of himself and justices AM Khanwilkar and Indu Malhotra, said the larger bench will decide all such religious issues relating to Sabarimala, entry of women in mosques and practice of female genital mutilation in the Dawoodi Bohra community. The state government was yet to react on the decision.

Former Kerala chief minister Oommen Chandy said the new decision will help in protecting the faith of devotees. He also hoped the pilgrimage season will be peaceful. Pandalam Royal family member Sasikumar Varma, one of the petitioners, said he was happy with the apex court’s decision to review the September 28 verdict allowing women of all age groups to offer prayers at the Sabarimala Ayyappa temple.


“The court understood the feelings of the devotees and transferred the petitions to be reviewed by a seven-judge bench. This means there was some error in the earlier judgment. We feel relieved and happy that the SC has decided to review its earlier verdict. This is Lord Ayyappa’s blessing,” he said.

Senior BJP leader Kummanam Rajasekharan said the review petitions being referred to a seven-judge bench point to the fact that there was some apparent error in the earlier verdict.

“The government must show restraint and wait for the larger bench’s verdict. In case women pilgrims in the banned age group try to offer worship, the government must prevent them from doing so,” Rajashekharan said. Welcoming the verdict, Kandararu Rajeevaru, head priest of the Sabarimala temple, said he respects the Supreme Court’s decision to refer last September’s verdict to a seven-judge bench.

“This gives us hope. This will strengthen the beliefs of devotees,” he said. Social activist Rahul Easwaran described it as “pro-faith judgment”.

Nobody should interfere in matters of faith, he added. Kerala had been rocked by violent protests after the LDF government decided to implement the Supreme Court verdict of September 28 last year allowing women of all age groups to offer prayers at the shrine. The Sabarimala temple will be open from November 16 and the annual two-month-long pilgrim season will begin from November 17.