Russia notes no progress on talks with US over Ukraine, NATO
A top Russian diplomat pressed the United States on Monday to ease a post-Cold War chill over Ukraine, ratcheting up Moscows demands that NATO pledge to stop giving membership to former Soviet states and halt weapons shipments to them that have led to what he called a precarious standoff.
With both sides dug in on their positions, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said no progress was made on the central demand to halt NATO expansion, although he insisted: We have no intention to invade Ukraine. Ryabkov spoke after his delegation wrapped up roughly 5-1/2 hours of talks with a US team led by his US counterpart, Wendy Sherman. The talks by senior US and Russian officials are part of a flurry of diplomatic activity in Europe this week aimed at defusing tensions over a Russian military buildup on the border with Ukraine. Putin described NATOs expansion to Ukraine and other Russian ex-Soviet neighbours as a red line for Moscow and demanded binding guarantees from the West that they wouldnt become members of the alliance.
The situation now is so dangerous, and so — I would say — precarious that we cannot afford any further delays in resolution of this very fundamental question. As President Putin said, on many occasions, we cannot backpedal. We cannot go backwards. There is no further space for us to do so. Ryabkov said.
Speaking at a news conference at the Russian mission in Geneva just as Sherman held a separate conference call with reporters, Ryabkov rattled off Russian concerns and demands first issued last month on subjects like NATO expansion and wanting Western commitments not to deploy offensive weapons near Russian borders.
The American side has treated the Russian proposals seriously and deeply studied them, he said, adding that he characterized Moscows demand for legally binding guarantees that NATO would not move eastward was an absolute imperative for us. He emphasised that it would be hard to work on other issues if the US stonewalled on the key Russian demands.
Without advances on those key issues that are absolutely essential for us, it would be problematic to work on other aspects, he added, apparently alluding to arms control and other thorny dossiers between the two countries. Moscow has sought to wrest a string of concessions from the US and its Western allies, and has massed an estimated 100,000 troops in steps that have raised concerns about a possible military intervention there.
Sherman called Mondays talks a frank and forthright discussion. Today was a discussion of a better understanding of each other and each others priorities and concerns, she said. It was not what you would call a negotiation. Were not to a point where were ready to set down texts and begin to go back and forth. We were firm, however, on pushing back on security proposals that are simply nonstarters for the United States,” Sherman said, adding we will not allow anyone to shut NATOs open-door policy that extends to countries seeking entry in the alliance.
“We will not forgo bilateral cooperation with sovereign states that wish to work with the United States. And, we will not make decisions about Ukraine without Ukraine, about Europe without Europe or about NATO without NATO. Echoing similar comments from Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Sherman said progress could only happen if Russia stays at the table and takes concrete steps to de-escalate tensions.” Weve made it clear that if Russia further invades Ukraine there will be significant costs and consequences well beyond what they faced in 2014, she said. Russia has a stark choice to make. The meeting was part of Strategic Security Dialogue talks on arms control and other broad issues launched by Putin and US President Joe Biden at a June summit in the Swiss city. Talks between Russia and NATO are planned Wednesday in Brussels followed by a meeting in Vienna of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe on Thursday, where the showdown will also loom large.
The US has played down hopes of significant progress this week and said some demands like a possible halt to NATO expansion go against countries sovereign rights to set up their own security arrangements, and are thus non-negotiable. But US officials have expressed openness to other ideas, like curtailing possible future deployments of offensive missiles in Ukraine and putting limits on American and NATO military exercises in Eastern Europe if Russia is willing to back off on Ukraine.
Blinken said bluntly Sunday that he doesnt expect any breakthroughs. Instead, he said a more likely positive outcome would be an agreement to de-escalate tensions in the short term and return to talks at an appropriate time in the future. But the US will have to see a de-escalation for there to be actual progress.
Its very hard to see that happening when theres an ongoing escalation, when Russia has a gun to the head of Ukraine with 100,000 troops near its borders, the possibility of doubling that on very short order, Blinken said on ABCs This Week. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg also sought to play down expectations earlier Monday. I dont think that we can expect that these meetings will solve all the issues,” he told reporters in Brussels on Monday after talks with Olga Stefanishyna, Ukraines deputy prime minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration. “What we are hoping for is that we can agree on a way forward, that we can agree on a series of meetings, that we can agree on a process. During a visit to Rome, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said dialogue offered the only way out of the crisis.
At the same time, its equally clear that a renewed breach of Ukrainian sovereignty by Russia would have grave consequences, she told reporters.
Russia has said it wants the issue resolved this month, but NATO is wary that Putin might be looking for a pretext, such as a failure in the negotiations, to launch an invasion.
The United States, which has emphasized that Ukraines government and those of other European countries need to be included in the discussions, plans to discuss some bilateral issues in Geneva but will not discuss European security without our European allies and partners, State Department spokesman Ned Price said Sunday.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by The Federal staff and is auto-published from a syndicated feed.)
