Five things people get wrong about standard English


By Willem Hollmann, Lancaster University Lancaster, Oct 9 (The Conversation) When I recently explained why teaching grammar in primary school still matters, Radio 4s Today programme invited me to debate the importance of standard English. My opponent was Nevile Gwynne, a British private tutor, author and, as presenter Nick Robinson put it, a stickler for the right sort of grammar.

Robinson asked that I explain my position, which is as follows: standard English should not be presented in the national curriculum as the only correct form, but as what it is, which is the socially most prestigious form. Saying it is the only correct way to speak puts those children who dont speak that way from birth at a disadvantage.

How so? Well, if your teacher tells you that I was going to the shops is the only correct way to say it, and if thats how youve always said it, youre going to have an easier time than another child who, at home, has always said, I were going to the shops, and has to change the way they speak when they get to school.

Does it really matter, Robinson asked Gwynne, if I say, I were going to the shops? It absolutely does, came Gwynnes reply. If you say, I were, youre just not thinking straight.


This position is as absurd as it is misguided. It implies that the 85% to 88% of the UK population that speak non-standard forms of English, not to mention the many millions of people elsewhere in the world who speak non-standard varieties of English, cannot think clearly.

And thats before you dig into the history of the language. Is that really a claim anyone wants to level against, well, every English speaker before 1400, which is when what we now think of as standard English in Britain first emerged? The op-eds that have since followed go further in demonstrating the widespread misunderstandings of what standard English is. Here then, a debunking of the five major myths.

1. Grammar and standard English grammar are the same thing Despite what some would argue, it is not contradictory to advocate for grammar to be taught and for standard English to be presented simply as one variety.

It is just as valid to tell a child that were in the non-standard clause I were is a verb, as it is to point to was in the standard clause I was. Both observations will help the child learn what a verb is, as opposed to a noun.

Discussing non-standard forms non-judgmentally may also help many children and parents feel less intimidated in and around school. Teachers might explore instances of non-standard conjugation. They might explain, for example, that some speakers in Lancashire use were instead of was, while others actually say was instead of were. The key here is for the teacher not to label Lancashire (or any other variety) as wrong but simply as a different dialect.

2. There is only one standard English English is a global language. And precisely because of this worldwide spread, there are several, different standard forms, including standard Scottish, Australian and American English.

A New Yorker, for example, who moves to London may well say gotten instead of the English Standard English got. The notion that there is a single, monolithic standard English be that across the world, in the UK or in England is a fiction.

Standard English is best characterised as the most prestigious dialect in those countries where it is spoken as a first language. It is highly codified in grammar books and dictionaries and used especially in formal writing.

Unlike regional dialects, it is not tied to a particular part of the country but rather to a segment the upper segment of the social scale. Much like other dialects, though, it continues to change.

3. Standard English and Received Pronunciation are the same thing Standard English is not about speaking in a posh accent. Linguists concur that anyone who speaks in the accent known as received pronunciation (RP) will also use the words and grammar that make up standard English. However, not all speakers of standard English have the same accent.

Of the UK population, only 3% speak in RP, whereas standard English is the home dialect of 12 to 15%. The expressions I was and I were do not represent variation in terms of accent but between standard and non-standard English.

4. Standard English is the only variety with clear rules Some critics defend standard English by stating, essentially, that its rules are crucial for people to understand each other. However, non-standard varieties of the English language also have grammatical rules.

I have written about Lancashire speakers who say I gave it him rather than I gave him it or I gave it to him. For them, thats a rule. Following it does not lead to a lack of clarity.

In fact, non-standard varieties can provide greater clarity. Take the word you. English used to differentiate between thou, to address one person, and you, for talking to two or more. Modern versions of numerous other languages, including French, Polish and Punjabi, still make this distinction. Standard English, by contrast, only has you, which is ambiguous. Many non-standard varieties are clearer: they have plural forms such as yous, yall or yins.

5. You need Standard English in order to think straight Elitist and classist, this fifth myth around standard English perfectly encapsulates why treating all dialects non-judgmentally is vital. It is important that it be taught as part of the national curriculum, particularly for use in formal writing. But many educational linguists agree that presenting it as the only correct way and by extension, telling a child they speak in an incorrect or wrong way is humiliating. It can discourage them from engaging fully in education. And that can only ever harm both the individuals concerned and society at large. (The Conversation) AMSAMS

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by The Federal staff and is auto-published from a syndicated feed.)